Gazlay Family History
 

FamilyLloyd Orville Schauer

Parents

Father[unknown]
Mother[unknown]

Personal Information

Record Created: 13 March 2011; Last Edited: 11 March 2013 
Person ID2157
NameLloyd Orville Schauer
GenderMale
Born 5 March 1896 in Pipestone, Pipestone County, Minnesota1, 2
Married 28 February 1937 in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri to Charlotte Debetta Laycox3, 4
Died May 19702

Person/Family

Spouse 1FamilyCharlotte Debetta Laycox (daughter of Herbert DeCamp Laycox and Charlotte Morgan ‘Lottie’ Gazlay)
Born 13 July 1906 in Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri
Married 28 February 1937 in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri to Lloyd Orville Schauer
Died 25 July 2001
  

Sources

  1. Draft Registration Card, World War I, Lloyd Orville Schauer, Card No. 88. This document shows his birth as 5 March 1896 in Pipestone, Minnesota. The date here is believed to be correct; other records list the date as 4 March.
  2. Social Security Death Index (SSDI), Rootsweb (website). Schauer, Lloyd; no. 495-03-2430.
  3. Email from Mary Fetter to Lee Gazlay, various dates in April and June 2013. The emails include as attachments 18 pages of hand-written family history notes containing the names, birth, marriage and death dates and places, primarily centered around the ancestors and descendants of Carl Adolph Hildebrand (1886-1965) and his wife Maria Elizabeth Gazlay (1883-1973). The pages include surnames Gazlay, Hildebrand, Rhoades, Morgan, Zehner, and Fetter, among many other surnames. The information in these pages matches the same information found in other (primarily public) records, so is considered highly reliable.
  4. Gazlay Family Tree, by David Paul Gazlay. First edition published June 1984. Second edition published August 2001. This extensive Gazlay family tree provides birth and death years (but not exact dates) for Gazlay descendants, and names (only) of spouses. No sources are cited, but the compiler is known to have collected information from numerous documents and Gazlay descendants. Names, dates, and relationships should be compared to other source citations.